2003 MCC Crossblade vs. 1992 Peugeot 205
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Peugeot 205. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Peugeot 205 would be higher. At 1,904 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Peugeot 205 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Peugeot 205 (104 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Peugeot 205 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2003 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Peugeot 205, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Peugeot 205 (144 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1992 Peugeot 205 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Crossblade | 1992 Peugeot 205 | |
| Make | MCC | Peugeot |
| Model | Crossblade | 205 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1992 |
| Engine Size | 598 cc | 1904 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 104 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 3710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1390 mm |
