2003 MCC Crossblade vs. 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer (114 HP) has 44 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Because 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer (373 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Crossblade | 1999 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | MCC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Crossblade | Lancer |
Year Released | 2003 | 1999 |
Engine Size | 598 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 114 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 373 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2520 mm |