2003 MCC Crossblade vs. 2000 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 SsangYong Korando. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 SsangYong Korando would be higher. At 2,874 cc (5 cylinders), 2000 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 SsangYong Korando (118 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2000 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 SsangYong Korando (257 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2000 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Crossblade | 2000 SsangYong Korando | |
| Make | MCC | SsangYong |
| Model | Crossblade | Korando |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 598 cc | 2874 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 257 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2490 mm |
