2003 MCC Crossblade vs. 2001 MCC Smart

To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 MCC Smart would be higher. At 599 cc (3 cylinders), 2001 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 11 more horse power than 2001 MCC Smart. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 2001 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Crossblade weights approximately 20 kg more than 2001 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 MCC Smart. (89 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2003 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 MCC Smart. 2001 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 2003 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2003 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: