2003 MCC Crossblade vs. 2001 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2003 MCC Crossblade is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Toyota Corolla. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Toyota Corolla would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Corolla is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Corolla (96 HP) has 26 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Corolla should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2003 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Corolla, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Corolla (132 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2001 Toyota Corolla will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Crossblade | 2001 Toyota Corolla | |
Make | MCC | Toyota |
Model | Crossblade | Corolla |
Year Released | 2003 | 2001 |
Engine Size | 598 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 96 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 132 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2480 mm |