2003 MCC Crossblade vs. 2003 MCC ForFour

To start off, both 2003 MCC Crossblade and 2003 MCC ForFour were released in the same year (2003). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 1,331 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MCC ForFour is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC ForFour (93 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC ForFour should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC ForFour weights approximately 230 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC ForFour (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2003 MCC ForFour will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications: