2003 MCC Crossblade vs. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder
To start off, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 3,949 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Pathfinder is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (270 HP) has 200 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Pathfinder weights approximately 1296 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (395 Nm) has 293 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Crossblade | 2005 Nissan Pathfinder | |
| Make | MCC | Nissan |
| Model | Crossblade | Pathfinder |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 598 cc | 3949 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 270 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 395 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 2036 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2810 mm |
