2003 MCC Crossblade vs. 2005 Toyota Vitz
To start off, 2005 Toyota Vitz is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 994 cc (3 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Vitz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 70 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Vitz weights approximately 240 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2003 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Vitz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Crossblade (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Vitz. (94 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2003 MCC Crossblade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Vitz.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Crossblade | 2005 Toyota Vitz | |
| Make | MCC | Toyota |
| Model | Crossblade | Vitz |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 598 cc | 994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 94 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 740 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 3760 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2530 mm |
