2003 MCC Crossblade vs. 2006 Mercury Milan

To start off, 2006 Mercury Milan is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,278 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mercury Milan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercury Milan (160 HP) has 90 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Milan should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercury Milan weights approximately 1092 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 Mercury Milan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Milan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercury Milan (213 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2006 Mercury Milan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications: