2003 MCC Crossblade vs. 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK
To start off, 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 2,996 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK (228 HP) has 158 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK (300 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Crossblade | 2007 Mercedes-Benz SLK | |
| Make | MCC | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Crossblade | SLK |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2007 |
| Engine Size | 598 cc | 2996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 70 HP | 228 HP |
| Torque | 102 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3210 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 2630 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1300 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 1810 mm | 2440 mm |
