2003 MCC Crossblade vs. 2011 Honda Jazz

To start off, 2011 Honda Jazz is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 1,339 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Honda Jazz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda Jazz (99 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda Jazz should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Honda Jazz weights approximately 307 kg more than 2003 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2003 MCC Crossblade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2003 MCC Crossblade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda Jazz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda Jazz (127 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2011 Honda Jazz will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Crossblade. 2011 Honda Jazz has automatic transmission and 2003 MCC Crossblade has manual transmission. 2003 MCC Crossblade will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Honda Jazz will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: