2003 MCC ForTwo vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC ForTwo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC ForTwo would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (261 HP) has 212 more horse power than 2003 MCC ForTwo. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC ForTwo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (340 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC ForTwo. (80 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC ForTwo | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | MCC | Holden |
Model | ForTwo | UTE |
Year Released | 2003 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 698 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 261 HP |
Torque | 80 Nm | 340 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |