2003 MCC Smart vs. 1953 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 1,247 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Triumph Mayflower is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (73 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 16 kg more than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Triumph Mayflower is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Triumph Mayflower. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (100 Nm) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Triumph Mayflower. (79 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Triumph Mayflower.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 1953 Triumph Mayflower | |
Make | MCC | Triumph |
Model | Smart | Mayflower |
Year Released | 2003 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 37 HP |
Torque | 100 Nm | 79 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 63 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.8 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 6.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 954 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2110 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 45 L |