2003 MCC Smart vs. 1954 Plymouth Belvedere
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Plymouth Belvedere would be higher. At 3,960 cc (8 cylinders), 1954 Plymouth Belvedere is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Plymouth Belvedere (156 HP) has 83 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Plymouth Belvedere should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1954 Plymouth Belvedere weights approximately 575 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1954 Plymouth Belvedere is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Plymouth Belvedere. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 1954 Plymouth Belvedere | |
Make | MCC | Plymouth |
Model | Smart | Belvedere |
Year Released | 2003 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 156 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 5190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2930 mm |