2003 MCC Smart vs. 1955 Renault Juva
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Renault Juva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Renault Juva would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 230 kg more than 1955 Renault Juva.
Because 1955 Renault Juva is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Renault Juva. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1955 Renault Juva has manual transmission. 1955 Renault Juva will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 1955 Renault Juva | |
Make | MCC | Renault |
Model | Smart | Juva |
Year Released | 2003 | 1955 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 747 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 745 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2360 mm |