2003 MCC Smart vs. 1959 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (106 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1959 Triumph Herald. (38 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1959 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 195 kg more than 1959 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (145 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Triumph Herald. (84 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Smart | 1959 Triumph Herald | |
| Make | MCC | Triumph |
| Model | Smart | Herald |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1147 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 38 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 84 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 69.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.8 mm | 76 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 780 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 29 L |
