2003 MCC Smart vs. 1959 Volvo 120
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,581 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (81 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1959 Volvo 120. (59 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1959 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Volvo 120 weights approximately 175 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1959 Volvo 120 (115 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (112 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1959 Volvo 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 1959 Volvo 120 | |
Make | MCC | Volvo |
Model | Smart | 120 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 698 cc | 1581 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2610 mm |