2003 MCC Smart vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 1,124 cc (3 cylinders), 2003 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (73 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 225 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Renault 8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Renault 8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 1962 Renault 8 | |
Make | MCC | Renault |
Model | Smart | 8 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 47 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2280 mm |