2003 MCC Smart vs. 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 would be higher. At 2,138 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 (104 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 weights approximately 195 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Smart | 1962 Triumph Dove GTR4 | |
| Make | MCC | Triumph |
| Model | Smart | Dove GTR4 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 698 cc | 2138 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2140 mm |
