2003 MCC Smart vs. 1964 Sunbeam Alpine
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Sunbeam Alpine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Sunbeam Alpine would be higher. At 1,592 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Sunbeam Alpine is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Sunbeam Alpine (79 HP) has 6 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Sunbeam Alpine should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Sunbeam Alpine weights approximately 30 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Sunbeam Alpine (128 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 1964 Sunbeam Alpine will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Smart | 1964 Sunbeam Alpine | |
| Make | MCC | Sunbeam |
| Model | Smart | Alpine |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1592 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 100 Nm | 128 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 81.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.8 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 40 L |
