2003 MCC Smart vs. 1965 Riley One-Point-Five
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley One-Point-Five. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley One-Point-Five would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (106 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1965 Riley One-Point-Five. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1965 Riley One-Point-Five. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 40 kg more than 1965 Riley One-Point-Five. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 Riley One-Point-Five is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Riley One-Point-Five. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (145 Nm) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Riley One-Point-Five. (112 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Riley One-Point-Five.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Smart | 1965 Riley One-Point-Five | |
| Make | MCC | Riley |
| Model | Smart | One-Point-Five |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1489 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 62 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 112 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.8 mm | 88.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 935 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1560 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2190 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 25 L |
