2003 MCC Smart vs. 1966 Wartburg 311
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Wartburg 311. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Wartburg 311 would be higher. At 1,124 cc (3 cylinders), 2003 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (73 HP) has 23 more horse power than 1966 Wartburg 311. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1966 Wartburg 311.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (100 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Wartburg 311. (98 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Wartburg 311.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 1966 Wartburg 311 | |
Make | MCC | Wartburg |
Model | Smart | 311 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 50 HP |
Torque | 100 Nm | 98 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.8 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 7.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 43 L |