2003 MCC Smart vs. 1966 Wartburg 312
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (106 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1966 Wartburg 312. (44 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1966 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 15 kg more than 1966 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (145 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Wartburg 312. (81 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Smart | 1966 Wartburg 312 | |
| Make | MCC | Wartburg |
| Model | Smart | 312 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 44 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 81 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 70 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.8 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 6.6:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2460 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 43 L |
