2003 MCC Smart vs. 1967 Steyr 700C

To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Steyr 700C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Steyr 700C would be higher. At 1,124 cc (3 cylinders), 2003 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (73 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1967 Steyr 700C. (24 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1967 Steyr 700C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 430 kg more than 1967 Steyr 700C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Steyr 700C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Steyr 700C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (100 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Steyr 700C. (41 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Steyr 700C. 2003 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1967 Steyr 700C has manual transmission. 1967 Steyr 700C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: