2003 MCC Smart vs. 1968 Steyr 650T

To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Steyr 650T. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Steyr 650T would be higher. At 1,124 cc (3 cylinders), 2003 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (73 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1968 Steyr 650T. (20 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1968 Steyr 650T. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 465 kg more than 1968 Steyr 650T. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1968 Steyr 650T is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Steyr 650T. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (100 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Steyr 650T. (40 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Steyr 650T.

Compare all specifications: