2003 MCC Smart vs. 1968 Steyr Haflinger
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Steyr Haflinger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Steyr Haflinger would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (106 HP) has 79 more horse power than 1968 Steyr Haflinger. (27 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1968 Steyr Haflinger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 321 kg more than 1968 Steyr Haflinger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Steyr Haflinger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 Steyr Haflinger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (145 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Steyr Haflinger. (44 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Steyr Haflinger.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 1968 Steyr Haflinger | |
Make | MCC | Steyr |
Model | Smart | Haflinger |
Year Released | 2003 | 1968 |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 643 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 27 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 44 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 654 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 2840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1360 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 1510 mm |