2003 MCC Smart vs. 1970 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1970 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 NSU Ro 80 (115 HP) has 9 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 235 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 NSU Ro 80 (162 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (145 Nm). This means 1970 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Smart | 1970 NSU Ro 80 | |
| Make | MCC | NSU |
| Model | Smart | Ro 80 |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1970 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2390 cc |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 115 HP |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2870 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 37 L |
