2003 MCC Smart vs. 1972 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,428 cc (4 cylinders), 1972 Nissan Bluebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (81 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1972 Nissan Bluebird. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1972 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Nissan Bluebird weights approximately 110 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Nissan Bluebird (116 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (112 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1972 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Smart | 1972 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | MCC | Nissan |
| Model | Smart | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 698 cc | 1428 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 116 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 930 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2430 mm |
