2003 MCC Smart vs. 1972 TVR M
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 TVR M would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 TVR M is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 TVR M weights approximately 45 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 1972 TVR M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 TVR M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1972 TVR M has manual transmission. 1972 TVR M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 1972 TVR M | |
Make | MCC | TVR |
Model | Smart | M |
Year Released | 2003 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 2994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2290 mm |