2003 MCC Smart vs. 1976 Suzuki LJ 50
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 would be higher. At 698 cc (3 cylinders), 2003 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (60 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. (26 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 weights approximately 10 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (95 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50. (52 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki LJ 50.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 1976 Suzuki LJ 50 | |
Make | MCC | Suzuki |
Model | Smart | LJ 50 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1976 |
Engine Size | 698 cc | 539 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 95 Nm | 52 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 1940 mm |