2003 MCC Smart vs. 1979 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,197 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Seat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (73 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1979 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1979 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 85 kg more than 1979 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (100 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 1979 Seat Ritmo | |
Make | MCC | Seat |
Model | Smart | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2003 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1197 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 63 HP |
Torque | 100 Nm | 92 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2460 mm |