2003 MCC Smart vs. 1981 Seat 131
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Seat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Seat 131 would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Seat 131 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (81 HP) has 28 more horse power than 1981 Seat 131. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1981 Seat 131. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Seat 131 weights approximately 145 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (112 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Seat 131. (94 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Seat 131.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 1981 Seat 131 | |
Make | MCC | Seat |
Model | Smart | 131 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 698 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 112 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2500 mm |