2003 MCC Smart vs. 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 1,795 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (73 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer. (57 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer weights approximately 90 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer (108 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Smart | 1986 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| Make | MCC | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Smart | Lancer |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1795 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 57 HP |
| Torque | 100 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2390 mm |
