2003 MCC Smart vs. 1987 Ford Telstar
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Ford Telstar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (106 HP) has 12 more horse power than 1987 Ford Telstar. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1987 Ford Telstar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Ford Telstar weights approximately 55 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Ford Telstar (158 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (145 Nm). This means 1987 Ford Telstar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 1987 Ford Telstar | |
Make | MCC | Ford |
Model | Smart | Telstar |
Year Released | 2003 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 94 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 158 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2520 mm |