2003 MCC Smart vs. 1987 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (106 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (60 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1987 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (145 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. (102 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Nissan Pulsar. 2003 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1987 Nissan Pulsar has manual transmission. 1987 Nissan Pulsar will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 1987 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | MCC | Nissan |
Model | Smart | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2003 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 60 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 102 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 75.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.8 mm | 70.1 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2440 mm |