2003 MCC Smart vs. 1987 Toyota Celica

To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Toyota Celica (182 HP) has 76 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Toyota Celica weights approximately 375 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1987 Toyota Celica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Toyota Celica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Toyota Celica (250 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (145 Nm). This means 1987 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart. 2003 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1987 Toyota Celica has manual transmission. 1987 Toyota Celica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2003 MCC Smart 1987 Toyota Celica
Make MCC Toyota
Model Smart Celica
Year Released 2003 1987
Body Type Hatchback Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1499 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 106 HP 182 HP
Torque 145 Nm 250 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 8.5:1
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 975 kg 1350 kg
Vehicle Length 3760 mm 4370 mm
Vehicle Width 1690 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1460 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2330 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 47 L 50 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]