2003 MCC Smart vs. 1988 Mitsubishi Starion

To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Mitsubishi Starion. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Mitsubishi Starion would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1988 Mitsubishi Starion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Mitsubishi Starion (102 HP) has 29 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Mitsubishi Starion should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1988 Mitsubishi Starion weights approximately 160 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1988 Mitsubishi Starion is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1988 Mitsubishi Starion. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1988 Mitsubishi Starion (164 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 1988 Mitsubishi Starion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.

Compare all specifications: