2003 MCC Smart vs. 1989 Plymouth Laser
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Plymouth Laser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Plymouth Laser would be higher. At 1,755 cc (4 cylinders), 1989 Plymouth Laser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1989 Plymouth Laser (91 HP) has 18 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1989 Plymouth Laser should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1989 Plymouth Laser weights approximately 185 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1989 Plymouth Laser (142 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 1989 Plymouth Laser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 1989 Plymouth Laser | |
Make | MCC | Plymouth |
Model | Smart | Laser |
Year Released | 2003 | 1989 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1755 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 91 HP |
Torque | 100 Nm | 142 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 965 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2480 mm |