2003 MCC Smart vs. 1990 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,453 cc, 1990 Toyota Lite Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Toyota Lite Ace weights approximately 134 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 1990 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1990 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1990 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Smart | 1990 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | MCC | Toyota |
| Model | Smart | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1990 |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1104 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1910 mm |
