2003 MCC Smart vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Minica

To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 1,124 cc (3 cylinders), 2003 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (73 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1992 Mitsubishi Minica. (30 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1992 Mitsubishi Minica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 330 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Minica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1992 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (100 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi Minica. (43 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi Minica. 2003 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1992 Mitsubishi Minica has manual transmission. 1992 Mitsubishi Minica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: