2003 MCC Smart vs. 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D would be higher. At 1,358 cc (4 cylinders), 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (73 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (51 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 100 kg more than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (100 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D. (89 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Smart | 1992 Rover 100 1.4 D | |
| Make | MCC | Rover |
| Model | Smart | 100 1.4 D |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1358 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 51 HP |
| Torque | 100 Nm | 89 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 70.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84.8 mm | 81.3 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 870 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
