2003 MCC Smart vs. 1996 Proton 300
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Proton 300 would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Proton 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Proton 300 weights approximately 140 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1996 Proton 300 has manual transmission. 1996 Proton 300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 1996 Proton 300 | |
Make | MCC | Proton |
Model | Smart | 300 |
Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2450 mm |