2003 MCC Smart vs. 1996 SsangYong Musso
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 SsangYong Musso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 SsangYong Musso would be higher. At 2,297 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 SsangYong Musso is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 SsangYong Musso is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 SsangYong Musso will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1996 SsangYong Musso has manual transmission. 1996 SsangYong Musso will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Smart | 1996 SsangYong Musso | |
| Make | MCC | SsangYong |
| Model | Smart | Musso |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 2297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 4650 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1740 mm |
