2003 MCC Smart vs. 1996 Subaru Vivio
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Subaru Vivio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Subaru Vivio would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (106 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1996 Subaru Vivio. (43 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1996 Subaru Vivio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 325 kg more than 1996 Subaru Vivio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (145 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Subaru Vivio. (54 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Subaru Vivio.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 1996 Subaru Vivio | |
Make | MCC | Subaru |
Model | Smart | Vivio |
Year Released | 2003 | 1996 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 43 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 54 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2320 mm |