2003 MCC Smart vs. 1998 Peugeot Tulip
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Peugeot Tulip. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Peugeot Tulip would be higher. At 1,996 cc, 1998 Peugeot Tulip is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Peugeot Tulip (89 HP) has 16 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Peugeot Tulip should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 90 kg more than 1998 Peugeot Tulip.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Peugeot Tulip (205 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 1998 Peugeot Tulip will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Smart | 1998 Peugeot Tulip | |
| Make | MCC | Peugeot |
| Model | Smart | Tulip |
| Year Released | 2003 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 100 Nm | 205 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 880 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 45 L |
