2003 MCC Smart vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 465 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (112 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2004 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Smart | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | MCC | Nissan |
| Model | Smart | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 698 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2540 mm |
