2003 MCC Smart vs. 2004 Spyker C8
To start off, 2004 Spyker C8 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 4,172 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Spyker C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Spyker C8 weights approximately 395 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 2004 Spyker C8 | |
Make | MCC | Spyker |
Model | Smart | C8 |
Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 698 cc | 4172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4190 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2580 mm |