2003 MCC Smart vs. 2004 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2004 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (81 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1100 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota 4Runner (382 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (112 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 2003 MCC Smart | 2004 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | MCC | Toyota |
| Model | Smart | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 2003 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 698 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 382 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2830 mm |
