2003 MCC Smart vs. 2005 Renault Scenic
To start off, 2005 Renault Scenic is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Scenic (110 HP) has 37 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Scenic weights approximately 730 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Scenic (101 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 2005 Renault Scenic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 2005 Renault Scenic | |
Make | MCC | Renault |
Model | Smart | Scenic |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 100 Nm | 101 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 970 kg | 1700 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 83 L |