2003 MCC Smart vs. 2005 Scion xA
To start off, 2005 Scion xA is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 106 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Scion xA weights approximately 95 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (145 Nm) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Scion xA. (142 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Scion xA.
Compare all specifications:
2003 MCC Smart | 2005 Scion xA | |
Make | MCC | Scion |
Model | Smart | xA |
Year Released | 2003 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1499 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 142 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84.8 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3760 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 45 L |